jester33 - 20 January 2010 01:52 PM
I still feel that CF is the best thing for me out there but to imply that being the winner at CF games makes one the best general athlete in the world is a little too much “drinking the kool-aid”. There are plenty of athletes that might get stomped in a specialized field like CF games that would still walk all over those same competitors in other arenas. No matter what, CF is specialized because muscle memory involved in CF workouts makes you better at those workouts. Your parallel skills might become somewhat better, but training CF is not going to make you a better fighter, marathoner, and jumper. It will make you better at CF. I know that plenty of people add to their CF workouts because CF is not enough on it’s own to attain a level of fitness for Special Forces training or similar stuff. That was all I was inferring. No system is perfect.
There are two things we are really discussing here:
1. Definition of Fitness
If you accept that fitness is defined as “work capacity across broad time and modal domains” then your argument that a CF athlete would be beat at a marathon by a marathoner is not what we are concerned with. What we mean is that if you can beat a CF athlete handily in a marathon, that CF athlete will very likely out perform you in a sprint, a deadlift, and rowing a boat. And in doing so, that CF athlete proves that he/she is more fit.
In a lot of ways, the adaptations of CrossFit that you mention are not created in an effort to make someone more generally fit, but to actually adapt CrossFit to specialized programs such that athletes specializing as their sport/profession demands, can also reap the benefits of more generalized fitness. Special Forces, for example, often require a bit of specialization in endurance due to the demands of operating. That specialization will come with a cost in strength and would thus hurt their overall fitness.
If you don’t agree with this idea of fitness, then our discussion is mostly moot because we haven’t defined our terms to start with.
2. CrossFit Methodology
The other concern you raise is whether following Crossfit Methodology will make you more fit than other methods. Here I think you are confusing a specific application of the CrossFit Methodology (the MainPage WOD) with the methodology as a whole. I would not claim that doing only the Crossfit Mainpage will make you the fittest person on the planet… that has yet to be shown and to me seems impractical. A program designed to help a wide spectrum of athletes will never be as effective as personalized programming. The MainPage is only one possible way in which CrossFit can be implemented. The argument we are making is that to be the fittest person on the planet (as defined above) you will have to be following the CrossFit prescription for training, not necessarily the most widely known application of that methodology (ie. mainPage WOD).
What that means is that whoever wins the CrossFit Games, which we assert best assesses fitness, will have been training in a manner that resembles CrossFit. Which means that they are training at high intensity over broad time and modal domains and in general moving large loads long distances quickly. This may not look like the mainsite, it might look like CrossFit Strength Bias, CrossFit FootBall, MEBB, OPT’s programming, or the stuff you alluded to that special forces guys are doing with CrossFit. But what we are asserting is that you won’t ever find a dude that wins the CF Games by sitting on the couch 6 days a week and taking his bike for a LSD ride on Sundays. Or by performing a high intensity body building program with LSD runs added in for conditioning.
We aren’t trying to claim that any specific CrossFit Programming is perfect, far from it. We are willing to throw out programming at a moment’s notice if something is found to be more effective. What I think people misunderstand, or perhaps a lot of CrossFitters misrepresent, is that the MainPage is not the be all and end all for elite fitness.
The idea that should truely be taken away, and the one that CrossFitters should strive to put forth, is that training with the CrossFit methodology properly applied to programing that adequately addresses an athlete’s weaknesses and goals will be the most effective way to meet our definition of fitness.