Sung - 16 December 2009 05:21 AM
Quick question on the pullups.
Everyone familiar with the 2 style of kip pullups?
1st is the way we’re taught. You know like in all those videos. Then as I progress and try to do them faster, I get into a rhythm and start to do them like Chris Speller when he’s going for those 100 pullups. If you’re unfamiliar with the 2 styles, this question is going to be confusing. It looks like you’re just doing a big circle(chin still goes above the bar).
If I stop myself in the middle of a set and try to go back to the original way, I tend to lose rhythm. Is the Speller way acceptable? I mean, I’m sure it is but does it do the same amount of work? I tested out this theory and for myself, the number of reps I can do is about the same either way, but the Speller(big circle way) gets it done way faster. This way puts more stress on the frontal shoulders when coming down at bottom. If you have bad shoulders, don’t do it.
Waddaya think?
The same amount of work is done in both methods and the butterfly kip is faster, so as far as increasing power output, that is a totally acceptable method to pull-up.
I find that the big circle way, (butterfly kipping pull-up or cyclical kipping pull-up), takes more body control as I move through the air and requires more of my strength to perform. The result of this is that as I fatigue in a set of butterfly kips, I will be unable to maintain a smooth ryhtm and will have to resort to the traditional kip.
In the end a max set of pull-ups for me will end up resembling Spealer’s set of 100… right… like that, only way shorter and much less impressive.

Anyway, I’ll usually be able to maintain butterfly for 75-90% of the reps (say 25 reps) and the last 9-10 are back to traditional to try and squeeze as many reps out for as long as I can grip the bar.